An Earth Day Poem

They cut from here and they planted there–

The phone call came at 7 in the morning

Rushed, heated and full of emotion

“They’re cutting them now”

Full of outrage, regret and memories

The response was unanimous

How could they?

Why would they?

A big girl recalled her past

And a different set of trees

Cleared to see more clearly beyond

She recalled a hammock

Full of fairy tales, full of games

And blinked away the memories

within the building tears

Later that day, the loss was mourned-

Gone was the potential of tree house gone were the cherry blossoms

Gone was the vehicle for climbing adventures

Gone was the privacy

Without a warning

(They cut from here)

Unasked and unwelcome

(Then they planted there)

Benefitting none but themselves

Liberating the silenced: The Power of Student Voice

Historically, when people are silenced, the universe rallies and advocates for them to be heard. Why? Because, especially here in the US, we believe that everyone everyone has a voice and that those voices deserve to be heard.

This is why, in my opinion, people appreciate the idea of democracy- the concept that the masses have a say in the decisions that affect them. In the US and other democratic nations around the world, the existence of the democratic philosophy sets the precedent of having those at the top listening to those who are affected by decisions made by those “admin.” Therefore, I believe that this should also apply in places other than the government, such as in teams, schools etc. I think getting feedback and input from different rungs in the hierarchical ladder is instrumental in strengthening communication, improving cooperation within the group and having an organization run happily, effectively and smoothly.

Some people believe that sure, democracy is fine, but allowing “subordinates” equal control with those “in power” is not realistic. In a way, I completely agree. As a student, I don’t presume to have a wealth of knowledge equal to that of my teachers. They have studied this material for far longer and in far more depth than I have. I simply believe that my input, in the areas in which I am informed, should be heard and at the very least, listened to. I believe everyone has the right and ability to enact change, to champion the needs and questions of their peers and to vie for a seat at the table in matters concerning them and their future. Age should not prevent students from exerting this right.

I am fortunate that at my school, teachers are open to these conversations, they appreciate feedback and are increasingly open to student thoughts and suggestions. Children are bold, sometimes I grant too bold, yet, the boldness should, usually, be encouraged. Boldness is a sign of confidence, trust in the leadership and a desire to share. Supporting the voices of the underrepresented encourages these positive qualities.

The bodies and minds of the future deserve a say in helping shape what they will receive eventually. Listening to the “young people” and the students is another facet of empowering the silenced. Hopefully, the idea of amplifying the voices of students will lead to initiatives targeted towards liberating the voices and upholding the idea of freedom of speech for other more severely oppressed groups all across the globe.

Big Issues and Small Actions

This week, the US Supreme Court has been hearing arguments to determine the constitutionality of two big laws on the subject of gay marriage: California’s Proposition 8 and DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act. As a result, the public has rallied. Flamboyant protestors with all kinds of signs surrounded the Supreme Court building on Tuesday and Wednesday. All across the country, people were expressing their opinions on social media, news sites etc. Lots of students in support of equal rights came to school wearing red. Additionally, on social media more and more people changed their profile pictures to red equal signs. Even those on the opposite side of the issue changed their profile pictures- some of them even to unequal signs. It was a great exhibit of free speech and how people speak from the heart when they are allowed to be heard.

All this sounds positive right? Free speech, spreading the word, getting the cause out etc. But a couple classmates of mine commented on the true effectiveness of such gestures. They said, “it’s not like me changing my profile picture, posting lengthy status or waving signs is going to change the Justices’ minds. So why do it? It just causes tension and draws attention with no little impact. We’re just kids, we don’t have a voice.”

I might have screamed “BUT YOU DO HAVE A VOICE. YOUR VOICE MATTERS.” But instead, I just decided to meditate upon the sadness of that statement.

I understand where that perspective comes from. Sure you may not influence this decision- but there’s always an off chance that you just might. Any action, no matter how small, helps raise some sort of awareness, helps perpetuate the spread of truth and ideas. I am of the opinion that everything helps. If I put a drop in the bucket, it’s at least one drop more than before. If everyone puts a drop in the bucket, we have an ocean.

Tony Wagner on “Creating Innovators”

The other day, I attended a talk at my school by Mr. Tony Wagner, most commonly known for his books the Global Achievement Gap and Creating Innovators. I found that his thoughts echoed the ideas of others whom I have read about concerning motivation, education and changes for the 21st century.

Wagner says that there are 3 challenges that come to mind when he thinks about young people and their current education. Nowadays, knowledge has become unlimited and commoditized — in a few years, Wagner believes we should be able to get high quality education without even leaving our beloved computer screens. Additionally, jobs that required basic, routine work have “disappeared” and lots of careers are being reimagined. Students need a different set of skills than ever before to simply get a job. This world is changing and is doing so quite rapidly.

Wagner’s essential question is, how do we prepare our young people for this changing world? Absorbing content should no longer be the focus for our schools, since what really counts now is not what students know but what they can do with what they know. To succeed, students must have the will and skill to transform their pre-existing knowledge.

Wagner has compiled, through his research, a set of essential skills for this modern world. He describes them as “core things every young person must be well on the way to mastering by end of high school so that they have skills of work and active citizenship.” Here are his 7 “survival skills”:

  1. Critical thinking and problem solving: Beyond just a buzzword, Wagner identifies critical thinking as the ability to ask the right questions, ask “good” questions, and to identify problems. This reminded me of Grant Lichtman‘s “The Falconer” and his philosophy called the Art of Questioning.
  2. Collaboration across networks: Appreciate the differences between yourself and others. Be able to lead through influence (sustained teamwork).
  3. Agility and adaptability: The ability to keep up with the constantly changing world and adjust to the curveballs life throws your way.
  4. Initiative and entrepreneurialism: Entrepreneurialism and the initiative to innovate form the subject of Wagner’s second book. I am a strong believer in FedEx days (as mentioned by Daniel Pink in his book Drive) and the Google rule as motivators for starting new ideas within a team (at school or in other organizations).
  5. Effective written and oral communication: Wagner said that students have not truly been asked to think enough. The influx of rote assignments, the benefits of writing what others want instead of what they think is most likely why Wagner says students also don’t know how to write with voice.
  6. Accessing and analyzing information: Nowadays, the consensus is why memorize when you have Google? However, it’s important to know what is worth memorizing and how to effectively conduct a Google search.
  7. Curiosity and imagination: Wagner cited Daniel Pink’s first book, “A Whole New Mind” as evidence for the importance of utilizing both halves of the brain often.

According to Wagner, these skills are far more important than content knowledge. Especially because content is constantly changing and updating so we end up having to relearn it anyways. Nowadays, tests (especially Advanced Placements and SATs) rely too much on multiple choice and factual recall, which in fact tell us very little about intelligence, aptitude and college readiness. As a result, colleges (notably Dartmouth) are beginning to drop APs, another sign of the lesser importance of solely content knowledge. Recent research suggests college grads leave no wiser in terms of survival skills and are no better equipped for the real world. Additionally, students graduating now are for the first time in what seems like forever, coming home from college without any job opportunities, which has served as a huge awakening.

People are realizing that we need not only these 7 skills, but something more. We need people who can innovate, think on their feet and make something from nothing. But the million-dollar question is how can we help people to become more innovative??

We were all born curious, creative and imaginative. We have the innate capabilities to innovate until those capabilities are “schooled out of us.” School gets us too worried about getting the right answer and we often lose the desire to ask questions for fear of being wrong or ridiculed for not knowing. That’s sad… In order to have a generation full of young people who can achieve success, we need to revert back to our childish inquisitiveness and abandon. The ability to let go and experiment is key to the modern world. And it’s not like growing a third arm or something — we have these abilities still. We must simply enable them to resurface and grow stronger.

In order to see what we can do to be more innovative, Wagner interviewed leading innovators of all ages and tried to find what influences enabled them. The majority of the people interviewed cited teachers, at least one per person, who had made the greatest impact on their lives. In every single case, these teachers were outliers in their respective institutions in terms of their philosophies and teaching methods. This made me think about how in my life, my teachers Mr. A and Mr. B, have similarly influenced and motivated me to strive for greater excellence and to think outside the box.

When Wagner researched schools that were deliberately teaching innovation, he found that they were all startups whose methods were totally different from normal schools, but consistent with those of the outlier teachers.

The culture of school as we currently follow it is radically at odds with the culture to innovate. School nowadays contradicts with the very criteria required for innovation in 5 main ways.

  • The current model of school values the individual and winning as one but innovation demands collaboration and teamwork.
  • The current model of school compartmentalizes and favors specialization. Innovation demands interdisciplinariness. (Yes that’s a word now :P ).
  • The current model of school is passive — sit and get. Innovation demands creation not consumption. Real production and answering open-ended questions is critical.
  • The current model of school penalizes failure. Innovation demands making mistakes and learning from them. A good motto to live by is fail early and fail often -- trial and error is key to innovation. Iteration. Learning from one process (what worked and what didn’t) then applying what worked, to the next course or project.
  • The current model of schooling relies on extrinsic incentives but innovation requires self-motivation. Once again, Daniel Pink’s “Drive” contains examples and proof of the power and greater effectiveness of intrinsic motivation.  Pursuing what you’re good at and what you enjoy as opposed to blind compliance and simply going with the pre-existing flow, leads to lasting motivation. Students nowadays connect and communicate and are empowered everywhere but in their classrooms. To do change this, Wagner says we need play, passion, and purpose; have exploratory learning, limit screen time, make it hands on, and involve play (like the long-standing MIT pranks) as an element of learning.

Wagner has a few ideas for making this playful, innovation-inducing learning happen. A good way to see what skills students are learning in each class and a nice form of assessing these skills is having a system like the Scouts Merit Badges. Then, graduation would serve “not as a degree for seat time served but as a reflection of mastery.” Additionally, instituting a DISCIPLINE OF REFLECTION AND SELF-ASSESSMENT would help create a more productive environment. Other such ideas that have proven to lead to more innovation include having an R&D budget in schools for something like a “maker-space” and implementing the Google rule of a day of play (where students could have some uninterrupted time for more focused learning). Students would also acquire valuable skills from this day of play by having to set goals, research questions, think, explore, and learn while documenting work in digital portfolios so as to be held accountable.

Wagner’s talk reaffirmed some ideas I’d previously heard of and appreciated, as well as solidified some concepts that had yet to be nailed down. I think Wagner shows mainly that the necessity for a mindset shift in the way we view schools is great and that people everywhere are realizing it.

UN sparked revelations

Over Spring Break, I had the lovely opportunity to visit the UN headquarters in New York.

On exhibit at this time were a set of photos under the title Journeys to School. This photos showed the hardships many children face just on their way to school. The captions file in the story, detailing how common (or as was often the case, uncommon) it was to go to school, what the classrooms looked like and the safety they represented for these children. It was truly touching.

What I found remarkable, if not a little disconcerting was the large list of places the exhibition covered. It made me think of how lucky I was. And I wondered, could education reform have another focus? Could we reform these schools, these journeys so that the burden was less, the joy greater and the success extrapolative? These children understand how lucky they are and yet they have so little. I have so much, yet often I, and other of my classmates, don’t realize how lucky we are to go to such nice schools, on paved roads, in cars. How can we take our time and make their smiles brighter, showing people that when you value education, it can truly bring happiness. I want that for all children. Happiness, especially through education. Learning should be enjoyable and should make you want to never stop. These children are like beacons of light- they endure injustice for the sake of a brighter future, for the sake of education.

Apart from the photo exhibition, all throughout the building we saw depictions of injustice, what the UN was trying to do to help and various examples of difficult lives from all over the world. For me, I was saddened and grateful for my blessed life. My sister however had some furious yet very wise words that really inspired me. “Instead of hurting people with wars, can’t countries help people and do things for good? If people do it for God, wouldn’t God want you to do good things? If we (as people) just stopped being mean and stopped interfering (as countries), we’d solve a lot of problems. If people just treated others the way they would like to be treated, the world would be nicer. It’s really that easy.”

I don’t know if that’s all it takes, but it’s definitely worth a shot.

Education as the North Star and a source of happiness. Kindness taking over. Sounds good to me!

Jack White and Conan O’Brien on work ethic and shying away from too much comfort

I was led recently from Dan Coyle’s blog “Talent Code,” to this video on a conversation between singer Jack White and Conan O’Brien.

And they had some fantastic ideas. Dan Coyle mentions their attention to how good art is created and their individual rituals that allow for deep work. In addition, I heard some points that I can relate to.

Jack White touts his minimalistic philosophy which he views as the power of threes. He believes that you shouldn’t have more than what you need and that his philosophy is his way of setting a limit because he has found that free reign leads to disinterest. Conan agreed saying, “Comfort can kill an artistic impulse.” In tandem with his desire for a limit, Jack believes in structure. For example, he writes when he needs to not just when “inspiration strikes” supporting an old adage that “necessity is the mother of invention.”

What I took away from this video was that one can’t get too comfortable because that breeds montony and laziness. I agree with this. When I’m on vacation, I have often still have things to do but if I don’t schedule them in or in some way hold myself to them, I get lazy and lose the desire to work, even on things I enjoy.

This applies to some ideas I’ve had in the past about school and its rigidity. In a way, that amount of structure is nice- it should lend itself to minimal procrastination. However, too much structure allows a comfortable lull all the same. A nice balance between preordained structure and a focused period of time in which to work creatively without a required subject matter is in my mind, the ideal.

“Everybody truly wants to learn”

I saw this video on “The Independent Project” thanks to a shout out from my old principal Mr. A. Within minutes of checking out the premise of the project, their website and this video, I was fascinated and frankly, hooked.

I think the idea behind a self motivated school situated inside a public school (a form that lends itself to more open learning if utilized to its full extent) is brilliant. That a bunch of interested students took focused time to work on a project that really interested them and had a concrete result upholds practically everything I’ve read on “modern education” thus far. Being affirmed in this project are various bits of Daniel Pink’s theories on the wonders of self-motivation, Cal Newport’s arguments promoting focused, concentrated effort and “the big project”, as well the general perceptions that school should fit the individual, and that a “good” school is one that helps further one’s development and instills values, information and ideas that stick and are relevant outside the classroom walls.

I think nowadays, school has come to take on a whole new slew of connotations. But at its core, school is place of learning. That’s it. The barebones definition of school should not require add-ons such as- helps you get into college, helps test-taking skills, a place that makes the district and teachers look good, workforce birther etc. Sure school can do that and help us in more ways than JUST learning, but the learning should come first- not standardized tests, not college, not jobs. Learning to learn, to have knowledge, to be aware to do things that require more than the rudiemntary skill fo filling in the bubble that matches with the memorized answer.

So it shouldn’t matter so much how that learning is achieved. In the video, one of the girls mentions how school “doesn’t help anyone because you’re trying to put people in boxes and humans just don’t fit in boxes.” We are all unique which means that, for better or worse, as a whole, we learn differently. Sure some people learn like others, but without any sort of delineation, teaching the same thing to the masses, regardless of their aptitude, their mindset, their interest or their learning style, is ridiculous and probably “unproductive.”

In the video, one of the group’s advisors mentions how in our society, students are simply passed along from class to class often with little to no enthusiasm or interest. These students sit on a conveyor belt powered by society and its requirements, which moves them glacially from one predestined location to another. By contrast, the students involved in the Independent Project, some of whom weren’t considered “great students” (grades wise) to begin with, are moving themselves. Just by being off the conveyor belt, the self-motivated environment overtime fuels a thirst for knowledge. As one student put it, they started “finding questions in everything” and wanting to learn about anything they stumbled across that they didn’t know.

That’s what makes this project so fantastic, in my opinion.

The students in the video also said some great things about why The Independent Project works and why it is even better, in some ways, than normal school.

  • As one girl said, “knowledge isn’t memorization, it’s more an exploration of facts.” As a result, the rote memorization required in most classes promotes less absorption of knowledge. If the same concepts were explored through a series of well crafted questions, designed to probe different aspects of the idea or problem, and the students found the answers on their own and then shared their findings so everyone got the big picture, the knowledge would be much more concrete. Research shows that being able to effectively teach a concept and answer most questions about said concept, shows a certain level of mastery. As a result of the Independent project, knowledge and information is more personal and you begin to make connections across the board which helps information stick without the help of the usual assessments. One student remarked that “I don’t need tests or quizzes to show I know something. I know that I know it and that I can express myself through it.” That sounds good enough to me…
  • While attending “normal school” prioritization is key. Sadly, if you’re not involved in an organized extra-curricular in your area of interest, other projects that you often have greater interest in are sidelined for school work. As the student who made a film said, “I can either push aside my creativity to struggle on something I simply don’t care about or I go with my creativity and do awful in school.” The beauty of the Independent Project is that it combines the project work with “academic work,” by splitting the day into chunks of time dedicated to those two things.
  • The guy who was effectually the creator of the project said that “it works because students end up doing so many creative things.” The advisor of the project also commented on how having the freedom to learn whatever you want (within the subject of the week) lends “a sense of agency, and that changes the way you act.” I think it’s important that she noted how the freedom influenced their actions, because I feel like some people would discount this project on the belief that nothing productive would emerge and that students would simply goof off. However this teachers statement proves that when given an opportunity to follow their interests “for credit” students will do just that.
  • Finally, another student echoed an idea I’ve supported for a while which shows why the students involved with the independent project thrived. He said that “you can’t achieve the broader goals you want and you don’t have the motivation get good at things unless you make school a place where people wanna be.” Because the students who participated in the independent project WANTED to be there, they accomplished great things.

Other people, more qualified and educated than little old me, also agree with the statements I have proposed above and the fundamental ideas behind the “Independent Project”. For example, this project exemplifies the school that the names I mentioned above preach about. In fact, this is not a passing fad. Some schools even make this sort of thing a potential course offering called the Independent Study. Independent studies, which at my school are offered to seniors, are one semester long (approximately) and usually require approval from a higher power as well as some sort of result at the end of the period but as for the topic, well, the sky is the limit.

There was one quote I heard that I felt really summed up the power of this project. When asked what they learned, a couple of students said something along the lines of “We realized that, everyone has interest in things and everybody truly wants to learn. We learned how to teach, we learned how to learn and we learned how to work. We learned how to ask questions and explore the answers in different methods. we learned to take what we learned and share with the others because it was our responsibility to make sure everyone in the group also learned from our work.”

To teach, to learn, to share, to explore, to listen, and to create- any school has the potential for their students to do this.